Vermont lawmakers consider 18 drinking age
by Andrea Abi-karam | The Daily Free Press (Boston University)
Issue date: 3/12/08 Section: News
(U-WIRE) — New England has become a battleground for the debate over underage drinking, as Vermont legislators are considering the possible risks of lowering the drinking age, while Mothers Against Drunk Driving in Massachusetts is pushing to make public intoxication at any age illegal.
The evolving debate over whether leniency or harsher penalties is needed to combat underage drinking has drawn attention to the growing gap between younger anti-prohibitionists and their parents.
Vermont Sen. Hinda Miller, a Democrat, sponsored a bill to form a task force that will assess the risk of lowering the drinking age and weigh the pros and cons of current drinking laws.
"I thought it was time to look at a law that was put into effect 20 years ago and see if it is still appropriate," she said.
Miller said though the Vermont legislature raised the drinking age from 18 to 21 in 1985, conditions have changed due to the increase in drunk driving checkpoints and binge drinking.
The original law was aimed at reducing traffic fatalities and MADD said alcohol-related fatalities have decreased by 40 percent since it has been in effect. What MADD does not mention, however, is that this research spans all age groups, not just those who are underage, Miller said.
MADD Massachusetts's solution to underage drinking is not to conduct more research, but to punish underage intoxication with fines equivalent to speeding tickets, said MADD Massachusetts spokesman David Deiuliis.
"What we're looking to do is make it a civil offense ... so that parents have a better idea of what their kids are up to, alcohol abuse problems could be detected earlier and direct that young person to treatment," he said.
Deiuliis said MADD is not concerned about Vermont's proposed bill and expects it to die in committee.
"If the legislature in Vermont feels like wasting taxpayers' money in creating a task force, it will take care of itself," he said. "If they ultimately do form a task force they will just figure out it's a bad idea."
The evolving debate over whether leniency or harsher penalties is needed to combat underage drinking has drawn attention to the growing gap between younger anti-prohibitionists and their parents.
Vermont Sen. Hinda Miller, a Democrat, sponsored a bill to form a task force that will assess the risk of lowering the drinking age and weigh the pros and cons of current drinking laws.
"I thought it was time to look at a law that was put into effect 20 years ago and see if it is still appropriate," she said.
Miller said though the Vermont legislature raised the drinking age from 18 to 21 in 1985, conditions have changed due to the increase in drunk driving checkpoints and binge drinking.
The original law was aimed at reducing traffic fatalities and MADD said alcohol-related fatalities have decreased by 40 percent since it has been in effect. What MADD does not mention, however, is that this research spans all age groups, not just those who are underage, Miller said.
MADD Massachusetts's solution to underage drinking is not to conduct more research, but to punish underage intoxication with fines equivalent to speeding tickets, said MADD Massachusetts spokesman David Deiuliis.
"What we're looking to do is make it a civil offense ... so that parents have a better idea of what their kids are up to, alcohol abuse problems could be detected earlier and direct that young person to treatment," he said.
Deiuliis said MADD is not concerned about Vermont's proposed bill and expects it to die in committee.
"If the legislature in Vermont feels like wasting taxpayers' money in creating a task force, it will take care of itself," he said. "If they ultimately do form a task force they will just figure out it's a bad idea."
Be the first to comment on this story